The Journal of General Physiology
Axon Instruments microelectrode amplifiers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dilger, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dilger, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J. Gen. Physiol.
© The Rockefeller University Press
0022-1295/97/03/401/14 $2.00
Volume 109, Number 3, March 1997 401-414

Mechanisms of Barbiturate Inhibition of Acetylcholine Receptor Channels

James P. Dilger,*Dagger Rebecca Boguslavsky,* Martin Barann,|| Tamir Katz,* and Ana Maria Vidal*

From the * Department of Anesthesiology, Dagger  Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8480; and || Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universität Bonn, Bonn 53105, Germany

We used patch clamp techniques to study the inhibitory effects of pentobarbital and barbital on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels from BC3H-1 cells. Single channel recording from outside-out patches reveals that both drugs cause acetylcholine-activated channel events to occur in bursts. The mean duration of gaps within bursts is 2 ms for 0.1 mM pentobarbital and 0.05 ms for 1 mM barbital. In addition, 1 mM barbital reduces the apparent single channel current by 15%. Both barbiturates decrease the duration of openings within a burst but have only a small effect on the burst duration. Macroscopic currents were activated by rapid perfusion of 300 µM acetylcholine to outside-out patches. The concentration dependence of peak current inhibition was fit with a Hill function; for pentobarbital, Ki = 32 µM, n = 1.09; for barbital, Ki = 1900 µM, n = 1.24. Inhibition is voltage independent. The kinetics of inhibition by pentobarbital are at least 30 times faster than inhibition by barbital (3 ms vs. <0.1 ms at the Ki). Pentobarbital binds >= 10-fold more tightly to open channels than to closed channels; we could not determine whether the binding of barbital is state dependent. Experiments performed with both barbiturates reveal that they do not compete for a single binding site on the acetylcholine receptor channel protein, but the binding of one barbiturate destabilizes the binding of the other. These results support a kinetic model in which barbiturates bind to both open and closed states of the AChR and block the flow of ions through the channel. An additional, lower-affinity binding site for pentobarbital may explain the effects seen at >100 µM pentobarbital.

Key words: pentobarbital;  barbital;  anesthetic;  patch clamp;  ion channels


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Rayes, M. J. De Rosa, M. Bartos, and C. Bouzat
Molecular Basis of the Differential Sensitivity of Nematode and Mammalian Muscle to the Anthelmintic Agent Levamisole
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36372 - 36381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. Bahadi, P. V. Farrelly, B. L. Kenna, C. C. Curtain, C. L. Masters, R. Cappai, K. J. Barnham, and J. I. Kourie
Cu2+-induced modification of the kinetics of A{beta}(1-42) channels
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): C873 - C880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
R. J. Prince, R. A. Pennington, and S. M. Sine
Mechanism of Tacrine Block at Adult Human Muscle Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
J. Gen. Physiol., August 26, 2002; 120(3): 369 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. P. Dilger
The effects of general anaesthetics on ligand-gated ion channels
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2002; 89(1): 41 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
I. Wenningmann and J. P. Dilger
The Kinetics of Inhibition of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by (+)-Tubocurarine and Pancuronium
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 790 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
H. R. Arias, E. A. McCardy, M. J. Gallagher, and M. P. Blanton
Interaction of Barbiturate Analogs with the Torpedo californica Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Ion Channel
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2001; 60(3): 497 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
I. Wenningmann, M. Barann, A. M. Vidal, and J. P. Dilger
The Effects of Isoflurane on Acetylcholine Receptor Channels: 3. Effects of Conservative Polar-to-Nonpolar Mutations within the Channel Pore
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2001; 60(3): 584 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
G. Spitzmaul, J. P. Dilger, and C. Bouzat
The Noncompetitive Inhibitor Quinacrine Modifies the Desensitization Kinetics of Muscle Acetylcholine Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2001; 60(2): 235 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Klaus, S. Friedrich, D. Reinhardt, and J. Bufler
Pentobarbital Has Curare-Like Effects on Adult-Type Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Channel Currents
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2000; 90(4): 970 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents