|
||

From the * Department of Anesthesiology, We used patch clamp techniques to study the inhibitory effects of pentobarbital and barbital on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels from BC3H-1 cells. Single channel recording from outside-out patches reveals that both drugs cause acetylcholine-activated channel events to occur in bursts. The mean duration of gaps
within bursts is 2 ms for 0.1 mM pentobarbital and 0.05 ms for 1 mM barbital. In addition, 1 mM barbital reduces
the apparent single channel current by 15%. Both barbiturates decrease the duration of openings within a burst
but have only a small effect on the burst duration. Macroscopic currents were activated by rapid perfusion of
300 µM acetylcholine to outside-out patches. The concentration dependence of peak current inhibition was fit
with a Hill function; for pentobarbital, Ki = 32 µM, n = 1.09; for barbital, Ki = 1900 µM, n = 1.24. Inhibition is
voltage independent. The kinetics of inhibition by pentobarbital are at least 30 times faster than inhibition by barbital (3 ms vs. <0.1 ms at the Ki). Pentobarbital binds
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New
York 11794-8480; and || Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universität Bonn, Bonn 53105, Germany
10-fold more tightly to open channels than to closed channels; we could not determine whether the binding of barbital is state dependent. Experiments performed with
both barbiturates reveal that they do not compete for a single binding site on the acetylcholine receptor channel protein, but the binding of one barbiturate destabilizes the binding of the other. These results support a kinetic
model in which barbiturates bind to both open and closed states of the AChR and block the flow of ions through
the channel. An additional, lower-affinity binding site for pentobarbital may explain the effects seen at >100 µM
pentobarbital.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Rayes, M. J. De Rosa, M. Bartos, and C. Bouzat Molecular Basis of the Differential Sensitivity of Nematode and Mammalian Muscle to the Anthelmintic Agent Levamisole J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36372 - 36381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bahadi, P. V. Farrelly, B. L. Kenna, C. C. Curtain, C. L. Masters, R. Cappai, K. J. Barnham, and J. I. Kourie Cu2+-induced modification of the kinetics of A{beta}(1-42) channels Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): C873 - C880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Prince, R. A. Pennington, and S. M. Sine Mechanism of Tacrine Block at Adult Human Muscle Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors J. Gen. Physiol., August 26, 2002; 120(3): 369 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Dilger The effects of general anaesthetics on ligand-gated ion channels Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2002; 89(1): 41 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Wenningmann and J. P. Dilger The Kinetics of Inhibition of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by (+)-Tubocurarine and Pancuronium Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 790 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Arias, E. A. McCardy, M. J. Gallagher, and M. P. Blanton Interaction of Barbiturate Analogs with the Torpedo californica Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Ion Channel Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2001; 60(3): 497 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Wenningmann, M. Barann, A. M. Vidal, and J. P. Dilger The Effects of Isoflurane on Acetylcholine Receptor Channels: 3. Effects of Conservative Polar-to-Nonpolar Mutations within the Channel Pore Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2001; 60(3): 584 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Spitzmaul, J. P. Dilger, and C. Bouzat The Noncompetitive Inhibitor Quinacrine Modifies the Desensitization Kinetics of Muscle Acetylcholine Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2001; 60(2): 235 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Klaus, S. Friedrich, D. Reinhardt, and J. Bufler Pentobarbital Has Curare-Like Effects on Adult-Type Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Channel Currents Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2000; 90(4): 970 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|