The Journal of General Physiology
Axon Instruments microelectrode amplifiers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online Jul 26 2004. doi:10.1085/jgp.200409057
The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295 $8.00
JGP, Volume 124, Number 2, 163-171
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sigworth, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sigworth, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Can Shaker Potassium Channels be Locked in the Deactivated State?

Youshan Yang, Yangyang Yan, and Fred J. Sigworth

Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520

Address correspondence to Fred Sigworth, Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8026. Fax: (203) 785-4951. email: fred.sigworth{at}yale.edu

For structural studies it would be useful to constrain the voltage sensor of a voltage-gated channel in its deactivated state. Here we consider one Shaker potassium channel mutant and speculate about others that might allow the channel to remain deactivated at zero membrane potential. Ionic and gating currents of F370C Shaker, expressed in Xenopus oocytes, were recorded in patches with internal application of the methanethiosulfonate reagent MTSET. It appears that the voltage dependence of voltage sensor movement is strongly shifted by reaction with internal MTSET, such that the voltage sensors appear to remain deactivated even at positive potentials. A disadvantage of this construct is that the rate of modification of voltage sensors by MTSET is quite low, ~0.17 mM–1·s–1 at –80 mV, and is expected to be much lower at depolarized potentials.

Key Words: patch clamp • gating current • MTSET • cysteine • S4


Abbreviation used in this paper: WTT, wild-type truncated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents