|
||
Address correspondence to Eduardo Solessio, Center for Vision Research, Weiskotten Hall, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210. Fax: (315) 464-7712; email: solessie{at}upstate.edu
The kinetics of activation and inactivation in the phototransduction pathway of developing Xenopus rods were studied. The gain of the activation steps in transduction (amplification) increased and photoresponses became more rapid as the rods matured from the larval to the adult stage. The time to peak was significantly shorter in adults (1.3 s) than tadpoles (2 s). Moreover, adult rods recovered twice as fast from saturating flashes than did larval rods without changes of the dominant time constant (2.5 s). Guanylate cyclase (GC) activity, determined using IBMX steps, increased in adult rods from
1.1 s1 to 3.7 s1 5 s after a saturating flash delivering 6,000 photoisomerizations. In larval rods, it increased from 1.8 s1 to 4.0 s1 9 s after an equivalent flash. However, the ratio of amplification to the measured dark phosphodiesterase activity was constant. Guanylate cyclaseactivating protein (GCAP1) levels and normalized Na+/Ca2+, K+ exchanger currents were increased in adults compared with tadpoles. Together, these results are consistent with the acceleration of the recovery phase in adult rods via developmental regulation of calcium homeostasis. Despite these large changes, the single photon response amplitude was
0.6 pA throughout development. Reduction of calcium feedback with BAPTA increased adult single photon response amplitudes threefold and reduced its cutoff frequency to that observed with tadpole rods. Linear mathematical modeling suggests that calcium-dependent feedback can account for the observed differences in the power spectra of larval and adult rods. We conclude that larval Xenopus maximize sensitivity at the expense of slower response kinetics while adults maximize response kinetics at the expense of sensitivity.
Key Words: signal transduction photoreceptors G protein cascade retina adaptation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Liang, R.-T. Yan, X. Li, M. Chimento, and S.-Z. Wang Reprogramming Progeny Cells of Embryonic RPE to Produce Photoreceptors: Development of Advanced Photoreceptor Traits under the Induction of neuroD Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 4145 - 4153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Knox and E. Solessio Shedding Light On Cones J. Gen. Physiol., March 27, 2006; 127(4): 355 - 358. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. P Jarvinen and T. D Lamb Inverted photocurrent responses from amphibian rod photoreceptors: role of membrane voltage in response recovery J. Physiol., July 15, 2005; 566(2): 455 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|