The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online May 30 2006. doi:10.1085/jgp.200509437
The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295 $8.00
JGP, Volume 127, Number 6, 703-717
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purohit, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grosman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Purohit, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grosman, C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Block of Muscle Nicotinic Receptors by Choline Suggests that the Activation and Desensitization Gates Act as Distinct Molecular Entities



Yamini Purohit and Claudio Grosman

Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, and Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801

Correspondence to Claudio Grosman: grosman{at}life.uiuc.edu

Ion channel block in muscle acetylcholine nicotinic receptors (AChRs) is an extensively reported phenomenon. Yet, the mechanisms underlying the interruption of ion flow or the interaction of the blocker with the channel's gates remain incompletely characterized. In this paper, we studied fast channel block by choline, a quaternary-ammonium cation that is also an endogenous weak agonist of this receptor, and a valuable tool in structure–function studies. Analysis of the single-channel current amplitude as a function of both choline concentration and voltage revealed that extracellular choline binds to the open-channel pore with millimolar apparent affinity (KB {cong} 12 mM in the presence of ~155 mM monovalent and 3.5 mM divalent, inorganic cations), and that it permeates the channel faster than acetylcholine. This, together with its relatively small size (~5.5 Å along its longest axis), suggests that the pore-blocking choline binding site is the selectivity filter itself, and that current blockages simply reflect the longer-lived sojourns of choline at this site. Kinetic analysis of single-channel traces indicated that increasing occupancy of the pore-blocking site by choline (as judged from the reduction of the single-channel current amplitude) is accompanied by the lengthening of (apparent) open interval durations. Consideration of a number of possible mechanisms firmly suggests that this prolongation results from the local effect of choline interfering with the operation of the activation gate (closure of blocked receptors is slower than that of unblocked receptors by a factor of ~13), whereas closure of the desensitization gate remains unaffected. Thus, we suggest that these two gates act as distinct molecular entities. Also, the detailed understanding gained here on how choline distorts the observed open-time durations can be used to compensate for this artifact during activation assays. This correction is necessary if we are to understand how choline binds to and gates the AChR.


Abbreviations used this paper: AChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Estimating Binding Affinities of the Nicotinic Receptor for Low-efficacy Ligands Using Mixtures of Agonists and Two-dimensional Concentration–Response Relationships
Yamini Purohit and Claudio Grosman
J. Gen. Physiol. 2006 127: 719-735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
A. Jha, D. J. Cadugan, P. Purohit, and A. Auerbach
Acetylcholine Receptor Gating at Extracellular Transmembrane Domain Interface: the Cys-Loop and M2 M3 Linker
J. Gen. Physiol., November 26, 2007; 130(6): 547 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
M. Bali and M. H. Akabas
The Location of a Closed Channel Gate in the GABAA Receptor Channel
J. Gen. Physiol., January 29, 2007; 129(2): 145 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. Corradi, G. Spitzmaul, M. J. De Rosa, M. Costabel, and C. Bouzat
Role of Pairwise Interactions between M1 and M2 Domains of the Nicotinic Receptor in Channel Gating
Biophys. J., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 76 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
Y. Purohit and C. Grosman
Estimating Binding Affinities of the Nicotinic Receptor for Low-efficacy Ligands Using Mixtures of Agonists and Two-dimensional Concentration-Response Relationships
J. Gen. Physiol., May 30, 2006; 127(6): 719 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents