Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text PDF (Full Text) PPT slides of all figures Supplemental Material Index Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Engh, A. M. Articles by Maduke, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Engh, A. M. Articles by Maduke, M. Related Collections Related Article Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

¹ Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
² Gordon Center for Integrative Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637

Correspondence to Merritt Maduke: maduke{at}stanford.edu

ClC-0 is a chloride channel whose gating is sensitive to both voltage and chloride. Based on analysis of gating kinetics using single-channel recordings, a five-state model was proposed to describe the dependence of ClC-0 fast-gate opening on voltage and external chloride (Chen, T.-Y., and C. Miller. 1996. J. Gen. Physiol. 108:237–250). We aimed to use this five-state model as a starting point for understanding the structural changes that occur during gating. Using macroscopic patch recordings, we were able to reproduce the effects of voltage and chloride that were reported by Chen and Miller and to fit our opening rate constant data to the five-state model. Upon further analysis of both our data and those of Chen and Miller, we learned that in contrast to their conclusions, (a) the features in the data are not adequate to rule out a simpler four-state model, and (b) the chloride-binding step is voltage dependent. In order to be able to evaluate the effects of mutants on gating (described in the companion paper, see Engh et al. on p. 351 of this issue), we developed a method for determining the error on gating model parameters, and evaluated the sources of this error. To begin to mesh the kinetic model(s) with the known CLC structures, a model of ClC-0 was generated computationally based on the X-ray crystal structure of the prokaryotic homolog ClC-ec1. Analysis of pore electrostatics in this homology model suggests that at least two of the conclusions derived from the gating kinetics analysis are consistent with the known CLC structures: (1) chloride binding is necessary for channel opening, and (2) chloride binding to any of the three known chloride-binding sites must be voltage dependent.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Zifarelli, A. R. Murgia, P. Soliani, and M. Pusch Intracellular Proton Regulation of ClC-0 J. Gen. Physiol., June 30, 2008; 132(1): 185 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.-Y. Chen and T.-C. Hwang CLC-0 and CFTR: Chloride Channels Evolved From Transporters Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 351 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Engh, J. D. Faraldo-Gomez, and M. Maduke The Role of a Conserved Lysine in Chloride- and Voltage-dependent ClC-0 Fast Gating J. Gen. Physiol., September 24, 2007; 130(4): 351 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents