The Journal of General Physiology
VISIT JCB ONLINE!
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1195K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinhardt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steinhardt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 20, 185-209, Copyright © 1936 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION IN THE HUMAN EYE

I. THE RELATION OF DeltaI/I TO INTENSITY



Jacinto Steinhardt 1

1 From the Laboratory of Biophysics, Columbia University, New York

New measurements of the brightness difference sensibility of the eye corroborate the data of previous workers which show that DeltaI/I decreases as I increases. Contrary to previous report, DeltaI/I does not normally increase again at high intensities, but instead decreases steadily, approaching a finite limiting value, which depends on the area of the test-field and on the brightness of the surrounding field.

On a logarithmic plot, the data of DeltaI/I against I for test-fields below 2° are continuous, whereas those for test-fields above 2° show a sharp discontinuity in the region of intensity in which DeltaI/I decreases rapidly. This discontinuity is shown to divide the data into predominantly rod function at low intensities, and predominantly cone function at high intensities. Fields below 2° give higher values of DeltaI/I at all intensities, when compared with larger fields. Fields greater than one or two degrees differ from one another principally on the low intensity side of the break. Changes in area above this limit are therefore mainly effective by changing the number of rods concerned. This is confirmed by experiments controlling the relative numbers of rods and cones with lights of different wavelength and with different retinal locations.

At high intensities DeltaI/I is extremely sensitive to changes in brightness of surrounding visual fields, except for large test-fields which effectually furnish their own surrounds. This sensitivity is especially marked for fields of less than half a degree in diameter. Although the effect is most conspicuous for high intensities, the surround brightness seems to affect the relation between variables as a whole, except in very small fields where absence of a surround of adequate brightness results in the distortion of the theoretical relation otherwise found.

The theoretical relationship for intensity discrimination derived by Hecht is shown to fit practically all of the data. Changes in experimental variables such as retinal image area, wavelength, fixation, and criterion may be described as affecting the numerical quantities of this relationship.

Accepted on December 14, 1935


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Lighting Research and TechnologyHome page
G. T. Yonemura
Criteria for recommending lighting levels
Lighting Research and Technology, January 1, 1981; 13(3): 113 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Jacobson
The Informational Capacity of the Human Eye
Science, March 16, 1951; 113(2933): 292 - 293.
[PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents