The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1326K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 22, 37-64, Copyright © 1938 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE OF NITELLA DURING ACTIVITY

Kenneth S. Cole 1 and Howard J. Curtis 1

1 From the Department of Physiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York

The changes in the alternating current impedance which occur during activity of cells of the fresh water plant Nitella have been measured with the current flow normal to the cell axis, at eight frequencies from 0.05 to 20 kilocycles per second, and with simultaneous records of the action potential under the impedance electrodes. At each frequency the resting cell was balanced in a Wheatstone bridge with a cathode ray oscillograph, and after electrical stimulation at one end of the cell, the changes in the complex impedance were determined from the bridge unbalance recorded by motion pictures of the oscillograph figure. An extension of the previous technique of interpretation of the transverse impedance shows that the normal membrane capacity of 0.9 µf./cm.2 decreases about 15 per cent without change of phase angle, while the membrane resistance decreases from 105 ohm cm.2 to about 500 ohm cm.2 during the passage of the excitation wave. This membrane change occurs during the latter part of the rising phase of the action potential, and it is shown that the membrane electromotive force remains unchanged until nearly the same time. The part of the action potential preceding these membrane changes is probably a passive fall of potential ahead of a partial short circuit.

Accepted on April 25, 1938


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
G. Karreman and H. D. Landahl
ON THE MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY OF EXCITATION PHENOMENA
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1952; 17(0): 293 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
K. S. Cole
PERMEABILITY AND IMPERMEABILITY OF CELL MEMBRANES FOR IONS
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1940; 8(0): 110 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents