The Journal of General Physiology
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1306K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Holway, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Holway, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 22, 341-364, Copyright © 1939 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL MECHANISMS

I. A VISUAL DISCRIMINOMETER. II. THRESHOLD STIMULUS INTENSITY AND RETINAL POSITION



W. J. Crozier 1 and A. H. Holway 1

1 From the Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge

Monocular threshold stimulus intensities (DeltaIo, photons) were measured along the 0–180° meridian of human retinae for three observers. The test image was small (= 0.08°) and of short duration (= 0.20 second). DeltaIo was found to decrease as the angular distance from the fovea was increased. Actual counts of the number of retinal elements per mm.2 along the 0–180° meridian (Østerberg) were compared with the obtained results. No direct correlation was found to exist between visual sensitivity and the number of retinal elements.

Binocular threshold stimuli were also measured along the same meridian. The form of the function relating binocular visual sensitivity and retinal position was discovered to be essentially similar to that for monocular sensitivity, but is more symmetrical about the center of the fovea. The magnitude of the binocular measurement is in each case smaller than that of the monocular threshold stimulus intensity for the more sensitive eye. The ratio is statistically equal to 1.4 (a fact which suggests Piper's rule).

These results are shown to be consistent with the hypothesis that the process critical for the eventuation of the threshold response is localized in the central nervous system. They are not consistent with the view that the quantitative properties of visual data are directly determined by properties of the peripheral retina.

Accepted on August 11, 1938


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. L. SALTZMAN and C. HAIG
TREATMENT OF RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA WITH COD LIVER OIL INJECTIONS AND PLACENTAL IMPLANTATION
Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 1950; 43(3): 419 - 430.
[Abstract] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents