The Journal of General Physiology
VISIT JCB ONLINE!
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 2436K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 34, 87-136, Copyright © 1950 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

ON THE VISIBILITY OF RADIATION AT THE HUMAN FOVEA

W. J. Crozier 1

1 From the Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge

1. Seeing-frequency functions (psi[S]) determined uniocularly for small (1.6'), brief images at the thoroughly dark-adapted human central fovea take the form of log-Gaussian integrals, for intensity or for exposure-time as the independent variable. They cannot be of Poisson type, since mean (tau') and standard deviation (sigma) are quite independently modifiable.

2. The properties of tau', the abscissa of inflection in the log-Gaussian integrals, and of sigma, are discussed in relation to customary determinations of spectral visibilities; agreements and certain necessary divergences are considered.

3. The values of sigmalogDeltaIlogDeltaI0, are distributed periodically, with 5 maxima in the range lambda383 to lambda712. Outside the fovea this is not the case. These maxima, and the intervening minima, are definitely correlated with "irregularities" in the values of tau' as function of lambda, with data on color threshold intensities, with data on "saturation," and quite specifically with minima and maxima in the data of lambda discrimination. They are unmistakably of analytical significance.

4. The interpretation of these properties is taken to require (consistent with the indications of other evidence) that under specified conditions the magnitude of sigma is a measure of the "size" of the population of excitable elements of neural effect, in the range of 0 to 100 per cent response-frequency as a function of wave number. This means that under the procedure used there is detectable the spectral distribution of local, specific, photosensitization. The sigma's refer to a property of the excitation process which is not affected by the action of irrelevant absorbers.

5. A preliminary test of this has been made by the use of mixed "monochromatic" lights. The total energy is empirically the significant quantity, although the separate effects of lambda's are sharply exhibited.

6. The lambda distribution of photosensitization indices, sigmalogDeltaIlogDeltaI0, is necessarily taken to have the nature of "action spectra." Careful search discloses, surprisingly enough, precise and apparently unique correspondence with the maxima and minima (and details of shape) required for the participation of: cytochrome-c reductase; the reduced forms of cytochromes-a and -c; and the often overlooked ferric-prophyrin bands of oxidized cytochrome-c.

7. For the central fovea, in which blood vessels are absent, and in which resistance to anoxia is at a maximum, the presence of an enzyme system of the sort here indicated is entirely reasonable. It is pointed out that a number of specific experiments can be based upon the general finding, whatever the causal mechanism for the sensitized lambda regions may in the end prove to be. The data cannot be reconciled to the demands of existing color primary theories, although apparently quite accurately consistent with varied observational data.

Submitted on May 25, 1950


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
V. E. KINSEY
PHYSIOLOGIC CHEMISTRY OF THE EYE: A Review of Papers Published During 1950
Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 1951; 46(4): 441 - 458.
[PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents