The Journal of General Physiology
World Precision Insruments
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 44, 1165-1176, Copyright © 1961 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

Lithium-Induced Oscillations of Potential and Resistance in Isolated Frog Skin

Alan Finkelstein 1

1 From the Physiology Institute, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.

Mr. Finkelstein's present address is The Rockefeller Institute, New York

The rhythmical variations of electrical potential and DC resistance resulting from the exposure of the anatomical outside of isolated frog skin to a concentration of lithium ion greater than 20 millinormal were reinvestigated. In general, the potential and resistance changes were in phase, although in some skins, a phase shift occurred after the first few waves. The mean level of the resistance declined during the exposure to lithium, returning to its former level upon reintroduction of sodium in place of lithium. The oscillations, with a period of from 3 to 15 minutes, could last for 2 hours or more before damping out; the amplitude of the waves could be altered during this time by the passage of direct current or by the introduction of a hydrostatic pressure difference across the skin. Even after the oscillations damped out, the system remained "excitable," responding to a step of direct current or hydrostatic pressure with an oscillatory train. The nature and magnitude of the response to current and pressure were dependent upon the "polarity" of the applied perturbation. Direct observation of the skin revealed no evidence of oscillatory water movement concomitant with the electrical events.

Submitted on December 20, 1960


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents