The Journal of General Physiology
VISIT JCB ONLINE!
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 821K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leb, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leb, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 48, 527-540, Copyright © 1965 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

Effects of Alkali Metal Gations on the Potential across Toad and Bullfrog Urinary Bladder

Daniel E. Leb 1, T. Hoshiko 1, and Barry D. Lindley with the technical assistance of James A. Dugan

1 From the Department of Physiology, Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland.

Dr. Leb's present address is Mount Sinai Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Lindley's present address is the Nobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Isolated urinary bladders of the bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) and the toad (B. marinus) were mounted in an Ussing chamber. Potential differences up to 114 mv were observed in bullfrog bladder when the mucosal surface was bathed in dilute Na2SO4 and the serosal surface in sulfate Ringer's. In experiments with bullfrogs, K was used to replace Na in the mucosal solution and Na was used for K in the serosal solutions. The selectivity was judged in terms of the relative effectiveness of the replacement cation in maintaining the bladder potential. In experiments with toads, K and Rb were equally poor replacements for Na at the mucosal border, while Rb was a good replacement for K at the serosal border. Li in the mucosal solution appeared to depress the potential in part irreversibly. At the serosal border, Li was a partially effective substitute for K, more so than was Na. However, both were poor replacements compared to Rb. The mucosal surface of the urinary bladder of both frog and toad appears to be Na-selective and the serosal surface appears to be K-selective, consistent with the Koefoed-Johnsen-Ussing model for frog skin.

Submitted on June 15, 1964


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. Davis and A. Finn
Sodium transport inhibition by amiloride reduces basolateral membrane potassium conductance in tight epithelia
Science, April 30, 1982; 216(4545): 525 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents