|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ARTICLE |
The hydraulic conductivity of the membranes surrounding the giant axon of the squid, Dosidicus gigas, was measured. In some axons the axoplasm was partially removed by suction. Perfusion was then established by insertion of a second pipette. In other axons the axoplasm was left intact and only one pipette was inserted. In both groups hydrostatic pressure was applied by means of a water column in a capillary manometer. Displacement of the meniscus in time gave the rate of fluid flowing across the axon sheath. In both groups osmotic differences across the membrane were established by the addition of a test molecule to the external medium which was seawater. The hydraulic conductivity determined by application of hydrostatic pressure was 10.6 ± 0.8.10-8 cm/sec cm H2O in perfused axons and 3.2 ± 0.6.10-8 cm/sec cm H2O in intact axons. When the driving force was an osmotic pressure gradient the conductivity was 4.5 ± 0.6 x 10-10 cm/sec cm H2O and 4.8 ± 0.9 x 10-10 cm/sec cm H2O in perfused and intact axons, respectively. A comparable result was found when the internal solution was made hyperosmotic. The fluid flow was a linear function of the hydrostatic pressure up to 70 cm of water. Glycerol outflux and membrane conductance were increased 1.6 and 1.1 times by the application of hydrostatic pressure. These increments do not give an explanation of the difference between the filtration coefficients. Other possible explanations are suggested and discussed.
Submitted on August 23, 1966
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Zajac, B. Dacanay, W. A. Mohler, and C. W. Wolgemuth Depolymerization-Driven Flow in Nematode Spermatozoa Relates Crawling Speed to Size and Shape Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3810 - 3823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
