|
||
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 90, 553-573, Copyright © 1987 by The Rockefeller University Press
ARTICLES |
K Yoshii, L Yu, KM Mayne, N Davidson and HA Lester
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125.
This study used messenger RNA encoding each subunit (alpha, beta, gamma and delta) of the nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor from mouse BC3H-1 cells and from Torpedo electric organ. The mRNA was synthesized in vitro by transcription with SP6 polymerase from cDNA clones. All 16 possible combinations that include one mRNA for each of alpha, beta, gamma, and delta were injected into oocytes. After allowing 2-3 d for translation and assembly, we assayed each oocyte for (a) receptor assembly, measured by the binding of [125I]alpha-bungarotoxin to the oocyte surface, and (b) ACh-induced conductance, measured under voltage clamp at various membrane potentials. All combinations yielded detectable assembly (30-fold range among different combinations) and ACh-induced conductances (greater than 1,000-fold range at 1 microM). On double-logarithmic coordinates, the dose-response relations all had a slope near 2 for low concentrations of ACh. Data were corrected for variations in efficiency of translation among identically injected oocytes by expressing ACh-induced conductance per femtomole of alpha- bungarotoxin-binding sites. Five combinations were tested for d- tubocurarine inhibition by the dose-ratio method; the apparent dissociation constant ranged from 0.08 to 0.27 microM. Matched responses and geometric means are used for describing the effects of changing a particular subunit (mouse vs. Torpedo) while maintaining the identity of the other subunits. A dramatic subunit-specific effect is that of the beta subunit on voltage sensitivity of the response: gACh(- 90 mV)/gACh(+30 mV) is always at least 1, but this ratio increases by an average of 3.5-fold if beta M replaces beta T. Also, combinations including gamma T or delta M usually produce greater receptor assembly than combinations including the homologous subunit from the other species. Finally, EACh is defined as the concentration of ACh inducing 1 microS/fmol at -60 mV; EACh is consistently lower for alpha M. We conclude that receptor assembly, voltage sensitivity, and EACh are governed by different properties.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Xiu, A. P. Hanek, J. Wang, H. A. Lester, and D. A. Dougherty A Unified View of the Role of Electrostatic Interactions in Modulating the Gating of Cys Loop Receptors J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41655 - 41666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Charpantier, A. Wiesner, K.-H. Huh, R. Ogier, J.-C. Hoda, G. Allaman, M. Raggenbass, D. Feuerbach, D. Bertrand, and C. Fuhrer {alpha}7 Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Are Negatively Regulated by Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Src-Family Kinases J. Neurosci., October 26, 2005; 25(43): 9836 - 9849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tong, J. Zull, and L. Yu Functional Expression and Signaling Properties of Cloned Human Parathyroid Hormone Receptor in Xenopus Oocytes J. Biol. Chem., April 5, 1996; 271(14): 8183 - 8191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhang and L. Yu Identification of Dynorphins as Endogenous Ligands for an Opioid Receptor-like Orphan Receptor J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 1995; 270(39): 22772 - 22776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nowak, P. Kearney, Sampson JR, M. Saks, C. Labarca, S. Silverman, W Zhong, J Thorson, J. Abelson, N Davidson, et al. Nicotinic receptor binding site probed with unnatural amino acid incorporation in intact cells Science, April 21, 1995; 268(5209): 439 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Leonard, C. Labarca, P Charnet, N Davidson, and H. Lester Evidence that the M2 membrane-spanning region lines the ion channel pore of the nicotinic receptor Science, December 16, 1988; 242(4885): 1578 - 1581. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lester Heterologous expression of excitability proteins: route to more specific drugs? Science, August 26, 1988; 241(4869): 1057 - 1063. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
|