The Journal of General Physiology
World Precision Insruments
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1105K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warshaw, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fay, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warshaw, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fay, F. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 91, Issue 6, 761-779
Copyright © 1988 by Society of General Physiologists


Articles

Characterization of cross-bridge elasticity and kinetics of cross-bridge cycling during force development in single smooth muscle cells

DM Warshaw, DD Rees, and FS Fay

Force development in smooth muscle, as in skeletal muscle, is believed to reflect recruitment of force-generating myosin cross-bridges. However, little is known about the events underlying cross-bridge recruitment as the muscle cell approaches peak isometric force and then enters a period of tension maintenance. In the present studies on single smooth muscle cells isolated from the toad (Bufo marinus) stomach muscularis, active muscle stiffness, calculated from the force response to small sinusoidal length changes (0.5% cell length, 250 Hz), was utilized to estimate the relative number of attached cross-bridges. By comparing stiffness during initial force development to stiffness during force redevelopment immediately after a quick release imposed at peak force, we propose that the instantaneous active stiffness of the cell reflects both a linearly elastic cross-bridge element having 1.5 times the compliance of the cross-bridge in frog skeletal muscle and a series elastic component having an exponential length-force relationship. At the onset of force development, the ratio of stiffness to force was 2.5 times greater than at peak isometric force. These data suggest that, upon activation, cross-bridges attach in at least two states (i.e., low-force-producing and high-force-producing) and redistribute to a steady state distribution at peak isometric force. The possibility that the cross-bridge cycling rate was modulated with time was also investigated by analyzing the time course of tension recovery to small, rapid step length changes (0.5% cell length in 2.5 ms) imposed during initial force development, at peak force, and after 15 s of tension maintenance. The rate of tension recovery slowed continuously throughout force development following activation and slowed further as force was maintained. Our results suggest that the kinetics of force production in smooth muscle may involve a redistribution of cross-bridge populations between two attached states and that the average cycling rate of these cross-bridges becomes slower with time during contraction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. A. Meiss and R. M. Pidaparti
Mechanical state of airway smooth muscle at very short lengths
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 655 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
S. S. An, R. E. Laudadio, J. Lai, R. A. Rogers, and J. J. Fredberg
Stiffness changes in cultured airway smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): C792 - C801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. Fabry, G. N. Maksym, S. A. Shore, P. E. Moore, R. A. Panettieri Jr., J. P. Butler, and J. J. Fredberg
Signal Transduction in Smooth Muscle: Selected Contribution: Time course and heterogeneity of contractile responses in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2001; 91(2): 986 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Gunst and M.-F. Wu
Plasticity in Skeletal, Cardiac, and Smooth Muscle: Selected Contribution: Plasticity of airway smooth muscle stiffness and extensibility: role of length-adaptive mechanisms
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2001; 90(2): 741 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. N. Maksym, B. Fabry, J. P. Butler, D. Navajas, D. J. Tschumperlin, J. D. Laporte, and J. J. Fredberg
Mechanical properties of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells from 0.05 to 0.4 Hz
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1619 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Fredberg and S. A. Shore
Invited Editorial on "Influence of intercellular tissue connections on airway muscle mechanics"
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1999; 86(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
U. Malmqvist, K. M. Trybus, S. Yagi, J. Carmichael, and F. S. Fay
Slow cycling of unphosphorylated myosin is inhibited by calponin, thus keeping smooth muscle relaxed
PNAS, July 8, 1997; 94(14): 7655 - 7660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Fredberg, K. A. Jones, M. Nathan, S. Raboudi, Y. S. Prakash, S. A. Shore, J. P. Butler, and G. C. Sieck
Friction in airway smooth muscle: mechanism, latch, and implications in asthma
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1996; 81(6): 2703 - 2703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents