|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 94, 863-879, Copyright © 1989 by The Rockefeller University Press
ARTICLES |
WD Fraser and AD Baines
Toronto General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
The effects of tight junction structure on water and solute fluxes across proximal tubular epithelium were examined with fiber-matrix equations previously derived by Curry and Michel (1980. Microvascular Research. 20:96-99). Using plausible estimates of tight junction fiber length and width the model predicts solute (Ps) and water permeability (Lp) coefficients that agree with the measured values. When fiber- matrix and pore models were compared for physiologically relevant ranges of matrix void fraction (80-98%) and pore radii (0-20 A), the fiber-matrix model predicted a 10-fold higher Lp/Ps ratio. Lp/Ps was most sensitive to small changes in tight junction structure when void fractions exceeded 90%. Void fractions of 96.5% and 97.1% predicted previously measured values for Lp and solute permeabilities in rat and rabbit proximal tubules. These values are consistent with void fractions and permeabilities of artificial membranes. The fiber-matrix tight junction model was incorporated into a model of reabsorption from the rat proximal tubule developed by Weinstein (1984). American Journal of Physiology. 247:F848-F862.) A void fraction of 98% predicted the experimental results for isosmotic reabsorption driven by active transport. Changing void fraction over the range of 97-99% produced a 50-75% change in predicted volume reabsorption with active transport. According to the fiber-matrix model: (a) solute permeabilities alone cannot be used to predict Lp, (b) previously measured solute permeabilities in the proximal tubule are compatible with significant water reabsorption through a water-permeable tight junction, and (c) hydraulic and solute permeabilities may be sensitive to small changes in tight junction fiber length and diameter or ionic strength within the tight junction.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Guo, A. M. Weinstein, and S. Weinbaum A dual-pathway ultrastructural model for the tight junction of rat proximal tubule epithelium Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): F241 - F257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Weinstein Mathematical models of renal fluid and electrolyte transport: acknowledging our uncertainty Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): F871 - F884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. H. Garcia, C. R. Ramsey, and F. G. Knox Understanding the Role of Paracellular Transport in the Proximal Tubule Physiology, February 1, 1998; 13(1): 38 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
