|
||
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 96, 535-557, Copyright © 1990 by The Rockefeller University Press
ARTICLES |
CL Huang
Physiological Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Potential-dependent inhibition of charge movement components by nifedipine was studied in intact, voltage-clamped, frog skeletal muscle fibers. Available charge was reduced by small shifts in holding potential (from -100 mV to -70 mV) in 2 microM nifedipine, without changes in the capacitance deduced from control (-120 mV to -100 mV) voltage steps made at a fully polarized (-100 mV) holding potential. These voltage-dependent effects did not occur in lower (0-0.5 microM) nifedipine concentrations. The voltage dependence of membrane capacitance at higher (10 microM) nifedipine concentrations was reduced even in fully polarized fibers, but shifting the holding voltage produced no further block. Voltage-dependent inhibition by nifedipine was associated with a fall in available charge, and a reduction in the charge and capacitance-voltage relationships and of late (q gamma) charging transients. It thus separated a membrane-capacitance with a distinct and steep steady-state voltage dependence. Tetracaine (2 mM) reduced voltage-dependent membrane capacitance and nonlinear charge more than did nifedipine. However, nifedipine did not exert voltage- dependent effects on charging currents, membrane capacitance, or inactivation of tetracaine-resistant (q beta) charge. This excludes participation of q beta, or the membrane charge as a whole, from the voltage-dependent effects of nifedipine. Rather, the findings suggest that the charge susceptible to potential-dependent block by nifedipine falls within the tetracaine-sensitive (q gamma) category of intramembrane charge.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Chawla, J. N. Skepper, and C. L.-H. Huang Differential effects of sarcoplasmic reticular Ca2+-ATPase inhibition on charge movements and calcium transients in intact amphibian skeletal muscle fibres J. Physiol., March 15, 2002; 539(3): 869 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|